COVID tore the country apart – more than two years on, we may be stronger for the struggle.
by Martin Davis
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Reporting on COVID in its early days gave me a front-row seat into how our deepest-held fears can manifest themselves in concerning ways.
It also gave me a first-hand look at how those who placed societal concern over their political opinions brought people together in creative and inspiring ways.
In a September 2021 piece for the Christian Science Monitor, for example, I reported on how athletic directors around the country navigated between embattled parents on one hand fighting fiercely over science and reality, and young athletes on the other hand who only wanted to pursue their athletic dreams in the limited window of years they have to be athletes.
As I wrote then:
Darryl Nance was watching his local school board meeting in Greenville, South Carolina, via Zoom last year when it dawned on him just how challenging the days ahead would be.
“In back-to-back speakers,” he says, the school district was called “liars [for] exaggerating the impact of COVID” and liars for supposedly “underreporting the number of positive [cases] and the impact of COVID in our schools.”
As the director of athletics for the district, he would have to navigate what was shaping up to be another culture war battlefront – whether to play high school sports during a pandemic.
He was hardly alone in that struggle last year, as athletic directors (ADs) nationwide faced a similar dynamic.
A year on, the nation remains divided over how best to respond to COVID-19. But in the arena of high school sports at least, ADs are finding some common ground with those who disagree about how to take steps forward. The reasons vary by community, but the result is prompting healthy discussion.
One thing almost everyone agrees on: the need to get kids playing sports again. And that shared objective creates an environment for creative solutions.
I found those solutions through people like Jen Brooks, then the athletic director at Ursuline Academy in St. Louis. When the St. Louis Health Department shut down high school athletics, a group of parents under the banner Let Them Play began protesting – sometimes in threatening ways – to get their kids back on the field.
Brooks wanted them playing, too, but knew the protests weren’t going to change the situation. “While I can appreciate the Let Them Play parents and their efforts,” she told me then, “they’re not in the thick of it and don’t know what an athletic program needs to run successfully,”
Instead, she partnered with area athletic directors, met with the health department to understand their concerns, and then worked collectively to get kids playing again through a series of mutually-agreed-upon protocols.
Rather than pitting sides against one another, Brooks found a reasoned way to hear everyone’s complaints and find a resolution. It proved a stunning success in a difficult year for high school athletics.
How Times Have Changed
Three years on, the anger and frustration of those days is largely forgotten. We better understand the realities of COVID, have more tools at our disposal for treating it, and a better appreciation for how to respect boundaries without being disrespectful.
I based this conclusion on an admittedly narrow data set – my own experiences over the past week.
You probably don’t know that a leading indicator of COVID infections, the “test positivity rate,” shows that we’re heading for a surge of infections. Nothing like we saw in January and February 2022, to be sure. But the number of cases is rising.
What’s different from now to then is our reaction.
I was one of those unfortunate few who tested positive earlier this week – if you’re wondering why my name hasn’t been showing up in bylines this week, well, now you know.
At almost 61 years of age, the diagnosis brought a certain level of fear. COVID is harder, after all, on the very young and older populations. But thanks to improved treatments, a better understanding of how the virus operates, and knowing what to watch for and what to do if certain symptoms appeared, I could convalesce without much worry about more-serious repercussions.
That knowledge puts not only the patient at ease, it puts the people around them at ease, too.
On Saturday afternoon, I ventured outside the house for the first time in a week (except for trips to see my doctor). I went to the grocery store with my wife. Fully masked, careful not to touch things, and hand sanitizer in tow. I lasted 10 minutes, then had to go home and go to bed. But I was out long enough to notice how things have changed.
I wasn’t chastised for being a liberal because I was masked up. In fact, I’m not sure anyone paid all that much attention that I was masked.
When people throughout the week found out I had COVID, I wasn’t hit with their political opinion about what they thought the virus was – a possible death sentence, or “just the flu” – but rather concern that I take care of myself, and offers to ease my load where they could.
(My profound thanks to my colleagues at James Monroe High School this past week for their understanding and help. And a huge thanks to Adele and Shaun and Leigh Anne who stepped up and took on more so that I haven’t had to think about the newspaper this week.)
Given how closely I’d watched the pandemic as a reporter, the difference in reaction from then until now was enough to make me ponder a simple question. What have we learned?
Politically involved, socially motivated
The answer is surprisingly simple.
When we are socially involved, we tend to put the needs of others above ourselves. As my grandmother regularly told me, “the best way to forget about your own troubles is to help those who are struggling more than you.” And there are always people whose troubles are worse than your own.
Jen Brooks understood that, and it enabled her to rise about the fray when we as a people weren’t putting people over politics.
We should all, of course, be politically involved. But the pandemic revealed the extent to which politics has become the first lens we tend to run people through.
The result is a national, regional, and local discourse that is increasingly course and dehumanizing.
Why have people led with social concern toward me this week and not political ones? Knowing how to fight the troubles that confront us definitely helps.
And when we don’t know? As was the case when the pandemic burst on the scene?
Well, we can look to Brooks, who was able to understand the frustrations and desire to reach for the political to get their way, but thought first about those who were struggling more than the parents. The athletes. That made her focus not on the angry and the political, but those who were hurting because they couldn’t do the thing they lived – play sports.
That path came through dialogue, and compromise.
As we head into this election year, we’d all do well to spend more time thinking about those worse off than us. If we can manage to put the social first, we may actually come through November feeling the way Brooks did toward the end of her first COVID season as AD.
“In the end, we were just … grateful that we’re sitting there watching [students] play what they love to do.”
Local Obituaries
To view local obituaries or to send a note to family and loved ones, please visit our website at the link that follows.
Weather and Traffic
Support Award-winning, Locally Focused Journalism
In less than a year, FXBG Advance has become the news leader in Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania, and Stafford through its innovative mix of:
Twice-daily newsletter – At 6 AM and 5 PM every Monday through Friday, the Advance brings the most important news directly to your inbox.
Education Reporting – Adele Uphaus has won multiple awards for her coverage of education issues locally and across the state. Now, she brings her experience, insights, and expertise to the Advance, providing our citizens some of the finest education writing and reporting in the commonwealth.
Political Reporting – From council meetings to campaigns, and fundraising to finance, the Advance is returning the Fourth Estate to its rightful place as a government watch dog.
Breaking News – From court cases to high-profile government moves, the Advance is the first to inform residents.
Investigative Journalism – Last year, the Advance broke major stories around improperly filed election documents, misleading sample ballots, disenfranchising Spotsylvania Count School parents, and book bans.
Election Coverage – The Advance offered the most complete coverage of the 2023 election, with in-depth candidate profiles, daily tracking of events, leading debates, and pre-dawn to post-midnight Election Day coverage. And 2024 brings even greater coverage.
Spotlights – From local businesses to nonprofit organizations and regional leaders, the Advance brings the people who make things happen to your attention.
Multi-partisan Commentary – Martin Davis is a 20-plus-year journalist recognized for superior commentary and political writing; Shaun Kenney has his hands on the pulse of political leaders across the Commonwealth. Together, they bring an unparalleled level of analysis and insight into the issues that drive debate in our region.
Political Cartoons – Clay Jones is a nationally recognized talent who draws weekly for CNN. He has returned to Fredericksburg to level his critical eye and razor-sharp drawing at the topics which make us both laugh, and look closer at ourselves.
New Dominion Podcast – Each week, Martin Davis and Shaun Kenney interview guests from across the region and the state. Growing to over 1,000 listeners in just six months, NDP has become a leading force in political, cultural, and social discussion.
We thank each and every one of you who have made the Advance a part of your day, and we’re excited to say that more-exciting announcements are just around the corner as we continue to innovate and expand our coverage of the region.
The donations of individual readers have made this year possible. Please join the hundreds who are supporting excellence in journalism by subscribing for just $8 a month.
Where does your money go?
It goes to support the great journalists we have – like Adele Uphaus – and the ones we look to hire in the year ahead.
If you can spare $8 a month, we’ll be both grateful, and reward your trust in us with more journalism, more stories, and more connections to organizations and people who make our region a great place to live.
If you can’t, thank you for reading the FXBG Advance!, and consider sharing us with your friends.
In 2024, let’s build an even better Advance – together!
Thank you for reading and supporting FXBG Advance.
-Martin Davis, Editor-in-Chief
And the men who hold high places
Must be the ones who start
To mold a new reality
Closer to the heart
Closer to the heart….
Rush
I admire your optimism, I do.
I do not share it.
Is the fact the reactions to catching the disease have changed evidence that we are now better people?
I doubt it.
I suspect it is due to things much more banal.
Indifference brought on by familiarity.
States of fear are hard to maintain over time. Why do you think Republicans roll out a new boogeyman every election? They have to. They have to connect to the lizard part of the brain, the part buried under the eons of rational thought. The reactionary, unthinking part.
All conservatism depends upon it.
Treatments, protocols, and vaccines which bring this disease into the realm of the known and manageable are here now. Much akin to the AIDS epidemic in the ’80s. So people are more familiar, less fearful.
AND, not having leaders acting as demagogues through their own ignorance, need for attention, and personal goals at the expense of the citizens makes a difference as well. Not sure if you’ve noticed, but there’s been a change in management since this all started.
Also, media empires built upon stoking those fears profiting from sowing confusion and fear, as I’ve said, have moved on to new fears and phobias for the weak-minded.
Not because they’ve gotten any better – but because for the 1st – they happen to not currently be in power, though that may change – if we really are intent on destroying our country – which it appears we may be.
And for the 2nd, because they, by necessity, have to move on to something else continually – to elicit new fears and the profits they bring. What’s the saying in media?
If it bleeds, it leads….
Seriously, glad to hear you are better.
But I just don’t see where weaving fantasies of success instead of looking at facts objectively is the way to go. Seems more like denying that reality in the hopes it goes away. If wishes were fishes, we’d all cast nets.
Meanwhile, I’m reading France and the Dreyfus Affair by Michael Burns, and am struck by how similar the racism, ignorance, and xenophobia of that time reflects the America of today.
Names change, but it’s a familiar story.
Do I have all of the answers? Nah.
But when it counts, I think truth matters more than making sure the story has a happy ending.
And the men who hold high places
Must be the ones who start
To mold a new reality
Closer to the heart
Closer to the heart….
Rush
I admire your optimism, I do.
I do not share it.
Is the fact the reactions to catching the disease have changed evidence that we are now better people?
I doubt it.
I suspect it is due to things much more banal.
Indifference brought on by familiarity.
States of fear are hard to maintain over time. Why do you think Republicans roll out a new boogeyman every election? They have to. They have to connect to the lizard part of the brain, the part buried under the eons of rational thought. The reactionary, unthinking part.
All conservatism depends upon it.
Treatments, protocols, and vaccines which bring this disease into the realm of the known and manageable are here now. Much akin to the AIDS epidemic in the ’80s. So people are more familiar, less fearful.
AND, not having leaders acting as demagogues through their own ignorance, need for attention, and personal goals at the expense of the citizens makes a difference as well. Not sure if you’ve noticed, but there’s been a change in management since this all started.
Also, media empires built upon stoking those fears profiting from sowing confusion and fear, as I’ve said, have moved on to new fears and phobias for the weak-minded.
Not because they’ve gotten any better – but because for the 1st – they happen to not currently be in power, though that may change – if we really are intent on destroying our country – which it appears we may be.
And for the 2nd, because they, by necessity, have to move on to something else continually – to elicit new fears and the profits they bring. What’s the saying in media?
If it bleeds, it leads….
Seriously, glad to hear you are better.
But I just don’t see where weaving fantasies of success instead of looking at facts objectively is the way to go. Seems more like denying that reality in the hopes it goes away. If wishes were fishes, we’d all cast nets.
Meanwhile, I’m reading France and the Dreyfus Affair by Michael Burns, and am struck by how similar the racism, ignorance, and xenophobia of that time reflects the America of today.
Names change, but it’s a familiar story.
Do I have all of the answers? Nah.
But when it counts, I think truth matters more than making sure the story has a happy ending.
This was lovely.
This was lovely.