26 views 10 min 0 Comment

Spotsylvania is in Trouble; Where is the Outrage?

- October 12, 2023

Governor Glenn Youngkin is conspicuously quiet regarding the one locality which is doing more than any other to push his agenda to undermine public education — Spotsylvania County.

by Martin Davis
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

In 2021, then-candidate Glenn Youngkin found a winning message – “Parents’ Rights.”

It’s an issue that has served him well.

Youngkin played on parents’ fears and frustrations about mask mandates; Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies; and curriculum during the campaign to energize his run for Richmond.

After winning the governor’s race, he then got involved in the case of a father who was arrested for disrupting a Loudon County School Board meeting by pardoning him before he had been convicted. All in the name of parents’ rights.

For all the bluster and criticism, however, Youngkin is conspicuously quiet in the one county that is arguably doing more than any other to push his agenda to undermine public education – Spotsylvania.

Speaking of Youngkin’s involvement in Loudon, University of Mary Washington political science professor Stephen Farnsworth told NBC4 Washington in September:

It serves political purposes, to be sure, for the governor to engage in Loudoun at every opportunity. I don’t know that it particularly wins him votes in Loudoun, but it certainly does energize the Republican base in other parts of the commonwealth or the country.

Youngkin has also made a habit of criticizing public schools while in office, all while celebrating charter schools and “school choice,” despite the fact that the same ruler he uses to criticize public schools (National Assessment of Educational Progress testing) shows that charter schools perform considerably lower than traditional public schools.

For all the bluster and criticism, however, Youngkin is conspicuously quiet in the one county that is arguably doing more than any other to push his agenda to undermine public education – Spotsylvania.

Where’s the outrage?

Youngkin’s obsession with the rights of parents in Loudon is not without cause. The suppression of a sexual assault case, for example, deserved the ire the governor hurled the county’s way.

But that same level of ire – at least – is fully justified in Spotsylvania.

During his time in office, Youngkin has visited Spotsylvania and Stafford on numerous occasions. And yet in those visits, he has remained silent about the debacle happening with the Spotsylvania School Board.

The list of problems is long. Meetings are dysfunctional. Board members actively call for burning books. The Board hired a superintendent with no qualifications for the job. Teachers are fleeing the county in numbers well out-of-proportion to surrounding school systems. There’s a mass exodus of Central Office staff. And the School Board majority has disenfranchised roughly 42% of citizens de facto by refusing their representatives on the Board the right to add items to the agenda or speak freely about constituent concerns.

In just under two years, this School Board has set back the Spotsylvania school system so far that it will likely take a full generation to recover.

Add in the facts that this School Board has not allowed any new business, or approved minutes, in a year, and one wonders why someone in Richmond isn’t hopping mad.

In just under two years, this School Board has set back the Spotsylvania school system so far that it will likely take a full generation to recover.

At the center of this dysfunction is Jon Russell, a right-wing extremist who found his way into Youngkin’s Education Department despite have no educational background. From there he somehow landed in Spotsylvania County as a senior-level staff member. He possibly earned the favor of Lisa Phelps and Kirk Twigg while at VDOE by helping them ram Mark Taylor’s superintendent’s license through the Board of Education.

A school system that once was admired by surrounding counties for its improvements has become a state and national embarrassment.

Therefore, don’t be surprised if this spring’s SOL scores – the same ones that Youngkin loves to pummel public schools with – will reflect the damage done by Lisa Phelps, Kirk Twigg, April Gillespie, and Rabih Abuismail.

For a governor supposedly committed to “excellence” in education, his silence about this debacle is deafening.

Ban, baby, ban

As if that weren’t enough, we now learn that Mark Taylor has acted unilaterally to remove another 23 books from library shelves, despite the fact that the boards that reviewed them found 21 of the 23 books were perfectly acceptable to stay on library shelves.

Among the titles are Song of Solomon by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Toni Morrison, and Homegoing by Yaa Gyasi. This latter book tells the story of a family from Ghana that deals with enslavement and racism in the U.S.

This brings to 37 the number of books that Taylor – a superintendent facing an exodus of teachers and a growing body of parents upset by his kowtowing to Jennifer Peterson, a one-woman wrecking ball in school libraries who prides herself on forcing her narrow view of morality and literature on every parent in Spotsylvania – has unilaterally removed from library shelves.

His plan is purportedly to turn them over the to the Central Rappahannock Regional Library, but that has yet to happen. And there’s no reason to believe that Taylor will actually do what he says with this new list of banned books.

So what’s Youngkin got to say as the parental backlash to Taylor’s manhandling of Virginia state code and board regulations marches forward?

Crickets.

Youngkin continues to push his “parents’ rights” trope as he positions himself for a run at the White House – a run that he set in motion on “Day One.”

The governor wants Virginians to believe that his attack on public education is an important step in making “Virginia the best place to live, work, and raise a family.”

So what’s Youngkin got to say as the parental backlash to Taylor’s manhandling of Virginia state code and board regulations marches forward?

Crickets.

Yet when the governor looks the other way as four radicals dismantle a public school system, and disenfranchises voters by stripping them of representation on the School Board, one has to wonder just who the governor is making Virginia the best place for.

It certainly isn’t the parents of Spotsylvania County.

So – where’s your outrage, Mr. Governor?

The county, along with its public schools, are on the verge of being completely consumed by people who have no interest in democracy. No interest in creating one of the best places to live, work, and play in Virginia.

His silence may well suggest that there is purpose in his not addressing the dismantling of public education in Spotsylvania.

He’s silent on Spotsylvania because he’s getting exactly what he wants.


The Fredericksburg Advance continues to bring local coverage of the November 2023 elections. For our 2023 Voters Guide please click on the link below:

To view local obituaries or to send a message to family and loved ones, please visit our website by clicking on the link below:


Support Local Journalism

The FXBG Advance is off and running, but we can’t do this without your help. You can support local journalism here in Fredericksburg by donating $8 a month. Your dollars will go toward hiring journalists so that we can broaden our reach and strengthen our coverage.

The content is now, and will continue to be, free.

Help us bring aboard the journalists who will elevate our coverage and strengthen the community we all share.

Consider joining for $8 monthly, $80 yearly, or becoming a supporting member for $200 or a Founding Member for $500.

Thank you for reading and supporting FXBG Advance.

-Martin Davis, Editor

- Published posts: 251

by Martin Davis EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

0 Comments
    Leo B Watkins

    Interesting article overall.

    But the assertion regarding charter vs public appears less clear to me from the website link than as reported in the article.

    Public charters vs Public regular seem about neck and neck – with a slight difference – but it isn’t enough to show that correlation is causation, is it?

    Mightn’t those in in public charters be more predisposed to difficulties anyway – so therefore they would be less likely to succeed? I dunno, but the numbers seem less clear than claimed.

    More interesting to me, is how little accountability thru testing is available for private charters. Which is all good and fine as long as they are not receiving public monies. If they want ignorant kids, this is America. You have the right to be Republican, er…sorry, ignorant. If we are supporting it in anyway though, there should be accountability. Too many horror stories such as the publicly supported Orthodox Jewish schools in NY whose graduates are barely literate.

    Also informative, was how consistently well the Catholic school system performed compared to everyone else. That seemed worth exploring.

    But yeah, Spotsy is a hot mess.

    With our dilletante Governor being awol when he is so much more micromanaging when it suits him and his personal political aspirations. You lay out that claim clearly and irrefutably. I pity them. Hope they work it out, and glad I have no one I care about either teaching or learning there.

    Though I would posit that the Loudon County sexual assault issue isn’t nearly as cut and dry as it now seems to be getting written into history. Many of the claims that the pardoned father made, and that right wing media trumpeted in angering voters, deserve much more context.

    Like the 1st sexual assault victim, by her own testimony according to the grand jury report, knew the assaulter, had previously had consensual sexual relations with him, and was the one who initiated the bathroom stall rendezvous.

    By that testimony – she did not agree to sexual relations that day, and he forced himself – for which he deserved to be both charged and convicted. But the incident seems much more like Trump and the woman he was found liable for assaulting – than some monster prowling the schoolyard.

    In some ways, it is even more understandable – in that it occurred between two minor teenagers both with troubled backgrounds prior to the incident, rather than with a 50 year old (at the time of the assault) “man” who is revered by a significant portion of the country.

    Yet the one is a demon for whom anyone who mismanaged his case should be cast into the abyss, while the other is one who is followed and obeyed without question by his kult, whom they would again have lead us as a country, despite the disastrous actions of his last adminstration – which is still reverberating thru the nation’s debt, health, diplomacy, Constitution, and courts.

    Strange times we live in.

    Thanks for writing.